If I could write this post while holding my breath, I probably would. It feels risky to talk about what has been bee-bopping around in my head because of a habit of being circumspect about what we are/were doing and choosing to be quiet about it over being overly talkative (and then not being able to take back what we’ve said). I’m talking about responding to the Great Commission in Matthew 28:19 “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,…” and actually going somewhere, to a people, that would otherwise not have the chance to hear about Jesus or see what a life dedicated to Jesus would look like. Certainly there are lots of ways to respond to the Great Commission, but one of those ways is to actually go. There is a word that many people still use to talk about the people who go to another culture to share Jesus with them (starts with “m”), but I’m still not comfortable using that word (too many misunderstandings and stereotypes attached to it).
Many of us who go, feel compelled to go to the “unreached” or “unengaged.” “Unreached” in this context means that less than 2% of the population are followers of Jesus. “Unengaged” means that there are no known followers of Jesus. It’s still crazy to me that, apparently, there only needs to be 2% of a population following Jesus to be sufficient enough to reach the rest of the population. Until then, even if someone wanted to know about Jesus, there aren’t enough believers in the mix of the population for that person to ever find someone who could share with them about Jesus. This is what compels many of us to go and what deters the argument of, “but there are plenty of people who need Jesus right here.” Because there are enough believers – even here in Portland, OR – for anybody who wanted to know about Jesus to be able to access him via whatever means (person, church, online, etc.) I’m not saying that we don’t need to reach out right where we are, I’m just saying that that isn’t an argument that overcomes the stats for those who “go.”
That makes these unengaged, unreached people seem super-duper remote, doesn’t it? The result being that many Western minds go to this idea of moving to the jungle and living in a grass hut – and most of us just don’t feel called or compelled to do that. But the reality is, most of these unreached and unengaged people live in cities and towns and yes, villages. But even in villages – most people aren’t living in grass huts. Mud bricks however…
The ideas surrounding what “goers” actually do and where they live came back to the forefront of my mind recently when I saw an announcement for a “Work as Worship” conference. By the way – I am in FULL support of this type of conference and any like it because I wholeheartedly agree that doing our work with purpose and faithfulness is an offering of worship to God and we all need encouragement that the repetitive, daily stuff we do is valuable to him. So in this announcement, it talked about how maybe you don’t feel called to be a pastor or a “m” (that word again – let’s keep saying “goer”) but instead you are in a “secular” vocation (ie: not ministry). I couldn’t help but think of all the other “goers” who I know – the majority of them work “secular” jobs, but in another country/culture/language. I realized (again) that there is still a wide-spread idea that “goers” are somehow doing something other than working “normal” jobs. Indeed, there are plenty of people who are doing ministry work vocationally and they are doing it in a country outside of their passport country. But the majority of the unreached, unengaged people groups don’t allow that. You have to have a job – whether with a non-governmental organization (charitable organization) or with a business. But either one of those require office hours, spreadsheets, meetings, production of something (even if it’s services) and some pretty “normal” mundane stuff that most other vocations require. For us, Monday through Friday, Rees usually went to work in the morning or he worked from home via computer. He would work in some strategic lunches and meet-ups with men who expressed a hunger for God and he’d pray for people when he was out on errands and he’d often bring one of those hungry young men with him on errands, but his day more or less looked like an extra social work day. Most of the “goers” we know have lives that look like that. I would be home with the kids – doing home school, feeding and clothing our household, joining in with whatever community stuff was going on, keeping track of where my kids were and what other kids were in my home. And we lived in a house – granted it was made of mud bricks, but you would never know by looking at it! I do a lot of that same stuff now – it’s just easier to do the feeding and clothing part now and the community and neighborhood aren’t so active and social so I have less obligations and “interruptions” (although, where we lived – those interruptions were just part of relationship). There is the awkward issue of pay-checks. That is a bit different. Many of these unreached, unengaged places have fragile economies and a generous dose of corruption so it doesn’t matter how great a business you run – it’s nearly impossible to make an income that supports your day-to-day life. So, many of us “goers” have supporters that contribute to our paychecks (another response to that Great Commission passage). Just a side note – it is pretty refreshing to not have “being extorted” as a line item on our budget these days!
I guess that’s what I would love for other believers to know – that “goers” are probably more similar to them than they may think. That we have a lot of encouragement and support to offer each other and that we are all just doing our best to let Jesus leak out of us into all the parts of our “normal” mundane lives.